Facebook Apps don’t Have to Suck, but Twitter is still better
Kind of a long title I know, but I thought it would be really good to start a conversation about the future of social networking. Now that Facebook, Myspace, and LinkedIn have become a huge part of the daily lives of the majority of Americans, it appears that most of us early adopters are leaving, opting to use other services for our communication, like Twitter. I can personally say that this is definitely the case for me, where I tweet at least 5 times a day, and only check Facebook when I get the occasional message from one of my friends.
First things first, Twitter is a social network
Amongst the conversation about decentralizing Twitter so we no longer have to deal with their down time, I came across this really interesting article about why decentralizing Twitter wouldn’t work. The main point that I found so interesting was Twitter existing as a social network, but rather being based around your profile the way that Facebook is, it’s completely based around your quick thought blasts. This means that I, as a follower of my friends, get a much quicker, and more complete view of my friends. If you follow me for example, you could very easily get a picture of what I do and who I am. Plus, there’s no pressure to conform to anything, no guidelines for interaction. It’s just your thoughts, right or wrong, funny or not, professional or not. That’s pretty darn cool, and why I find myself using Twitter more and more each day. It’s simply a better communication platform than any other social network has provided.
That being said, Facebook and Myspace are not going anywhere
Despite the fact I haven’t looked at Myspace in like, ever, it still gets 74% of social network traffic. Now Myspace’s numbers are decreasing, but Facebook is still getting more traffic and more applications. But that increase in applications is a big reason for the loss of a lot of the early adopters that Myspace suffered when Facebook launch, most applications do nothing more than turning up the noise. Sure, a song in someone’s profile is fun for about five minutes, and then the song is over, and the next time you check a profile it’s just annoying. And that’s the problem, the “just for fun” applications that spread the most quickly serve mostly as spam and noise.
What can Facebook do that Twitter Can’t?
The answer is simple, and leads to the way that Facebook applications can be made to be useful, context. A person’s friends, and more importantly the large amount of profile information that users work tirelessly to fill out can provide a context in which communication can be made more effective.
For example, does anyone actually want to be marketed to?
Yes, when they’re looking for the product that you’re marketing. When I’m looking for a new car, I want to hear about cars.
All of that information is already waiting within someone’s profile, and when you enhance that with their friends information and input, the context of the communication, you have a formula for building something of value through the Facebook application.
Use the context to make something Useful
This seems to be the hardest part, because useful doesn’t always translate into really high viral growth, and most applications haven’t started to think of how they can make a user’s life better through the use of the application. That simple question will lead to better applications and a better user experience overall
So, in short, Twitter is now my preferred social network and communication platform, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. However, I’m not ready to give up on Facebook and it’s users yet. Just because someone hasn’t used the context to create value yet, doesn’t mean that it can’t be done. In fact, I’m positive that it will be done.
Think I’m crazy? Leave some comments below, this is a conversation I’d love to continue to have.
June 1st, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Since Rupert Murdoch famously purchased MySpace, it’s been getting flashier and there’s been more advertising beyond the banner ads, which are ever present, and the main page ads, which were acceptable. They’ve also been adding customization options that look a little like facebook. But Craigslist, which has a permanent presence and ever-rising usership, is super simple, like a page made for a highschool assignment in 1998. I think the lesson in MySpace’s falling numbers is that they shouldn’t compete with FaceBook when they can do their own thing as well as they already do: I want an online address book with pictures and embedded email and simple bloging, I don’t want to send people cupcakes, ecards, find out which movie I am, or “poke” someone.